Classifying the discontinuity of a piecewise function at x = 0
Consider the piecewise function
Determine whether is continuous at . If it is not continuous, classify the discontinuity at as removable, jump, or infinite, and justify your answer using the one-sided limits and the value .
Hint
Compute , , and separately, then compare all three to see which part of the continuity definition fails.
Step-by-step solution
Since uses the rule , we have , and . For the right-hand limit, since uses , we get .
The left-hand limit is and the right-hand limit is ; since these are unequal finite numbers, does not exist, even though both one-sided limits exist. This means condition two of the continuity test fails in the specific way where the two sides disagree, so has a jump discontinuity at .
Redefining the function value to fix the discontinuity
Hint
Step-by-step solution
No. In part a, the discontinuity at zero was classified as a jump discontinuity, since the left-hand and right-hand limits are unequal finite numbers, meaning the two-sided limit does not exist at all. Redefining b(0) only changes the function's value at that point, but it cannot make the left- and right-hand limits agree with each other. This fix only works for removable discontinuities, where the limit exists but simply does not match the function value.
Related problems
Practice similar Calculus problems interactively.
Start Closing the Gap