← Back to learning objective

Classifying the discontinuity of a piecewise function at x = 0

Consider the piecewise function b(x)={x3x≤0x2+1x>0b(x) = \begin{cases} x^3 & x \le 0 \\ x^2 + 1 & x > 0 \end{cases}

Determine whether b(x)b(x) is continuous at x=0x=0. If it is not continuous, classify the discontinuity at x=0x=0 as removable, jump, or infinite, and justify your answer using the one-sided limits and the value b(0)b(0).

Hint

Compute lim⁡x→0−b(x)\lim_{x\to 0^-} b(x), lim⁡x→0+b(x)\lim_{x\to 0^+} b(x), and b(0)b(0) separately, then compare all three to see which part of the continuity definition fails.

Step-by-step solution

Since x≤0x \le 0 uses the rule x3x^3, we have b(0)=03=0b(0) = 0^3 = 0, and lim⁡x→0−b(x)=lim⁡x→0−x3=0\lim_{x\to 0^-} b(x) = \lim_{x\to 0^-} x^3 = 0. For the right-hand limit, since x>0x>0 uses x2+1x^2+1, we get lim⁡x→0+b(x)=02+1=1\lim_{x\to 0^+} b(x) = 0^2+1 = 1.

The left-hand limit is 00 and the right-hand limit is 11; since these are unequal finite numbers, lim⁡x→0b(x)\lim_{x\to 0} b(x) does not exist, even though both one-sided limits exist. This means condition two of the continuity test fails in the specific way where the two sides disagree, so b(x)b(x) has a jump discontinuity at x=0x=0.

Redefining the function value to fix the discontinuity

Hint
Step-by-step solution

No. In part a, the discontinuity at zero was classified as a jump discontinuity, since the left-hand and right-hand limits are unequal finite numbers, meaning the two-sided limit does not exist at all. Redefining b(0) only changes the function's value at that point, but it cannot make the left- and right-hand limits agree with each other. This fix only works for removable discontinuities, where the limit exists but simply does not match the function value.

Related problems

Practice similar Calculus problems interactively.

Start Closing the Gap