Indeterminate forms 00 and ∞∞ arise when direct substitution fails in limit evaluation. L'Hopital's Rule resolves them by differentiating numerator and denominator separately, then re-evaluating the limit.
Understanding Indeterminate Forms
When evaluating limx→ag(x)f(x) through direct substitution, you sometimes encounter 00 or ∞∞. These are indeterminate forms—the limit could equal any value or fail to exist entirely, depending on the specific functions involved. Elementary techniques like factoring or rationalizing resolve some cases, but many require a more systematic approach.
L'Hopital's Rule
If limx→ag(x)f(x) produces 00 or ∞∞, and both f and g are differentiable near a with g′(x)=0 nearby, then:
limx→ag(x)f(x)=limx→ag′(x)f′(x)
Key point: Differentiate the numerator and denominator separately—this is not the quotient rule. The rule applies to limits as x→±∞ as well.
Verification and Reapplication
Always verify that substitution yields 00 or ∞∞ before applying the rule; using it on determinate forms produces incorrect answers. After differentiating once, check the new limit. If it's still indeterminate, reapply the rule. Stop once direct substitution yields a determinate value.
Example: limx→0xsinx
Direct substitution: 00 ✓ Apply the rule:
limx→0xsinx=limx→01cosx=1
Example: limx→∞exx2
Direct substitution: ∞∞ ✓ First application:
limx→∞ex2x(still ∞∞)
Second application:
limx→∞ex2=0
Common Pitfalls
Avoid applying L'Hopital's Rule to non-indeterminate forms like 05. Never substitute the quotient rule inside the rule itself—differentiate f and g independently. Other indeterminate forms (0⋅∞, ∞−∞, 1∞) must first be algebraically rewritten as 00 or ∞∞ before proceeding.
Practice similar problems interactively, with instant feedback.
Start Closing the Gap