Classify the discontinuity at x = 1
Consider the function Note that is undefined at both and , since both values make the denominator zero.
Simplify by factoring the denominator, then determine . Based on the three-part definition of continuity, explain which condition(s) fail at , and classify the discontinuity there as removable, jump, or infinite.
Hint
Factor as a difference of squares and cancel common factors with the numerator before taking the limit.
Step-by-step solution
Factor the denominator: , so for , This simplification is valid everywhere except at , where the original expression is .
Taking the limit using the simplified form, , so the limit exists. However, itself is undefined since the original function has in the denominator there.
Since the limit exists but is not defined, the condition 'f(a) must be defined' fails while the limit condition holds. This means the discontinuity at is removable — the graph has a hole at that could be patched by defining .
Compare with the discontinuity at x = -1
Now consider the point , where is also undefined. Using the simplified form (valid for ), determine what happens to as , and explain how the type of discontinuity at differs from the type found at .
Hint
Check whether the factor causing the zero in the denominator at also cancels with a factor in the numerator, as it did at .
Step-by-step solution
At , the factor in the denominator does not cancel with anything in the numerator , since does not equal zero at . So unlike at , there is no common factor to remove.
As , the denominator while the numerator approaches , so the one-sided limits grow without bound (one side toward and the other toward ), meaning the limit does not exist in the finite sense.
Because at least one one-sided limit is infinite, this corresponds to a vertical asymptote at , which is an infinite discontinuity — a fundamentally different type from the removable hole found at .
Related problems
Practice similar Calculus problems interactively.
Start Closing the Gap