Squeeze theorem applied to an exponential-trig limit
Consider the function , which is defined for all .
Recognizing when the Squeeze Theorem cannot be applied
Attempt to use the Squeeze Theorem to evaluate Since for all , find bounding functions for that are valid near , evaluate their limits as , and determine whether the conditions of the Squeeze Theorem are satisfied. If the Squeeze Theorem cannot be applied, explain why and determine whether the original limit exists.
Hint
Multiply the inequality through by (note for all , so the inequality direction doesn't flip). Then take the limit of the outer two expressions as using direct substitution. What do you notice about these limits? In particular, do they have the same value? If not, can the Squeeze Theorem be applied?
Step-by-step solution
Since holds for every , and for all real , multiplying every part of this inequality by preserves the direction of the inequalities: This gives us bounding functions and that sandwich near .
Now we evaluate the limits of these bounding functions as . Since both and are continuous at , we use direct substitution: and Crucially, these two limits are different: .
The Squeeze Theorem requires that the upper and lower bounding functions approach the same finite value. Since our bounding functions approach different limits, the conditions of the Squeeze Theorem are not satisfied, and we cannot use it to conclude that has a limit.
To determine whether the original limit exists, we analyze the behavior directly. As , we have , while oscillates between and infinitely many times. Therefore, oscillates between values near and without converging to any single value.
Conclusion: does not exist (DNE). This problem illustrates an important limitation: the Squeeze Theorem cannot always be applied, even when bounding functions are available. The theorem requires equal limits at the boundary.
Related problems
Practice similar Calculus problems interactively.
Start Closing the Gap